Win - SLC rastering problem

Gatto · 2017-02-22 11:53:06

What is wrong with this slc file ?

Reopened in Rhino it looks ok, but creating a plate only one piece is rastered.

https://we.tl/atsbOAyLbX

Shahin · 2017-02-24 19:35:16

Looks like pieces hangs on different height. Preview layers you see what I mean.

Gatto · 2017-02-24 20:06:18

Shahin wrote:

Looks like pieces hangs on different height. Preview layers you see what I mean.

They are on same z plane, if problem was that you can se other models on other layers, but they arent.

Shahin · 2017-02-24 20:48:11

Data for each layer is completely separate on SLC format. It is very unlikely it is the cause of the issue.

Could you share screenshot of the SLC opened with Rhino? (I do not have rhino)

Gatto · 2017-02-25 08:17:57

Shahin wrote:

Data for each layer is completely separate on SLC format. It is very unlikely it is the cause of the issue.
Could you share screenshot of the SLC opened with Rhino? (I do not have rhino)

Z0 every vector, all closed.

Shahin · 2017-02-25 08:33:12

Gatto,

SLC file which you have shared is totally different to screenshots. I see couple of completely different ring designs and etc.
Download what you have uploaded.

Gatto · 2017-02-25 08:59:11

Sorry, your'r right, this was other one with same problem. I will post other one.

Gatto · 2017-02-25 09:08:54

Gatto · 2017-02-25 09:14:58

7938 layers, it looks like every single object is sliced after previous one, not on same raster but on extra layers appended.

Shahin · 2017-02-25 09:31:10

You are right. Very interesting way of storing data.

2017/02/25 12:04:24.076025 {"Layer":"1","module":"SLC","level":"Notice","msg":"Extracting Layer 7461 - Z Level 32.775 - Boundries 2"}
2017/02/25 12:04:24.176182 {"Layer":"1","module":"SLC","level":"Notice","msg":"Extracting Layer 7462 - Z Level 32.825 - Boundries 1"}
2017/02/25 12:04:24.176232 {"Layer":"1","module":"SLC","level":"Notice","msg":"Extracting Layer 7463 - Z Level 32.875 - Boundries 1"}
2017/02/25 12:04:24.176265 {"Layer":"1","module":"SLC","level":"Notice","msg":"Extracting Layer 7464 - Z Level 32.925 - Boundries 0"}
2017/02/25 12:04:24.176286 {"Layer":"1","module":"SLC","level":"Notice","msg":"Extracting Layer 7465 - Z Level 0.025 - Boundries 3"}
2017/02/25 12:04:24.276496 {"Layer":"1","module":"SLC","level":"Notice","msg":"Extracting Layer 7466 - Z Level 0.075 - Boundries 3"}
2017/02/25 12:04:24.277570 {"Layer":"1","module":"SLC","level":"Notice","msg":"Extracting Layer 7467 - Z Level 0.125 - Boundries 3"}
2017/02/25 12:04:24.277647 {"Layer":"1","module":"SLC","level":"Notice","msg":"Extracting Layer 7468 - Z Level 0.175 - Boundries 3"}
2017/02/25 12:04:24.277728 {"Layer":"1","module":"SLC","level":"Notice","msg":"Extracting Layer 7469 - Z Level 0.225 - Boundries 3"}
2017/02/25 12:04:24.378020 {"Layer":"1","module":"SLC","level":"Notice","msg":"Extracting Layer 7470 - Z Level 0.275 - Boundries 3"}

Z Level data for each piece is separate. So to make sure everything for a layer included we need to loop over whole file for each layer which is waste of processing. I have not seen any file with this structure.
Which program you have used to export the file?

Based on SLC file format (http://paulbourke.net/dataformats/slc/), " The contour data section is a series of successive ascending Z cross-sections or layers with the accompanying contour data. Each Contour Layer contains the minimum Z layer value, number of boundaries followed by the list of individual boundary data. ", I believe it is an invalid SLC file.

Gatto · 2017-02-25 10:07:24

This one http://www.miicraft.com/miicraft.com/mi … 61227).rar

Shahin · 2017-02-25 10:30:09

Use asiga stomp

mandreas · 2017-02-25 10:33:41

I use Netfabb Premium (there is also a free version "basic") to repair and transform 3d models in SLC, is the best ever (initially I used rhino)

Gatto · 2017-02-25 13:49:40

mandreas wrote:

I use Netfabb Premium (there is also a free version "basic") to repair and transform 3d models in SLC, is the best ever (initially I used rhino)

Netfabb 2007 do the trick, just to see if after trial it will still export to SLC. According website it will become like basic after trial, you know something more ?

mandreas · 2017-02-26 00:47:41

Netfabb 2007 do the trick, just to see if after trial it will still export to SLC. According website it will become like basic after trial, you know something more ?

you're right, actually export is possible only with the premium version

Gatto · 2017-02-26 07:43:40

Shahin wrote:

Use asiga stomp

According their license, is not legal if you do not own an Asiga printer.

Yes we know, but a barely legal image, we must have.

Shahin · 2017-02-26 07:54:30

Could you provide link to the license file?

I have plan to provide STL to native nanodlp format standalone application soon.

Gatto · 2017-02-26 10:17:23

Shahin wrote:

Could you provide link to the license file?

Sorry, you'r right, I did a mistake reading other machine's sw EULA.

Shahin · 2017-02-27 07:43:52

Any specific reason why you do not use internal slicer? I have found a bug in slicer logic which slow down the process for large file which you have shared on another thread. Right now the speed must be acceptable specially on windows.

Gatto · 2017-02-27 07:59:51

Shahin wrote:

Any specific reason why you do not use internal slicer? I have found a bug in slicer logic which slow down the process for large file which you have shared on another thread. Right now the speed must be acceptable specially on windows.

I'll be happy to use internal slicer, problem was that on huge STLs server bricks. Fixed server is already out?

Shahin · 2017-02-27 08:06:15

Yes, it is already updated.

Gatto · 2017-02-27 08:12:59

Shahin wrote:

Yes, it is already updated.

Thank you, today I will give a try.

nanoDLP

#1 2017-02-22 11:53:06

Win - SLC rastering problem

#2 2017-02-24 19:35:16

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#3 2017-02-24 20:06:18

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#4 2017-02-24 20:48:11

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#5 2017-02-25 08:17:57

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#6 2017-02-25 08:33:12

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#7 2017-02-25 08:59:11

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#8 2017-02-25 09:08:54

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#9 2017-02-25 09:14:58

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#10 2017-02-25 09:31:10

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#11 2017-02-25 10:07:24

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#12 2017-02-25 10:30:09

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#13 2017-02-25 10:33:41

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#14 2017-02-25 13:49:40

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#15 2017-02-26 00:47:41

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#16 2017-02-26 07:43:40

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#17 2017-02-26 07:54:30

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#18 2017-02-26 10:17:23

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#19 2017-02-27 07:43:52

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#20 2017-02-27 07:59:51

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#21 2017-02-27 08:06:15

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

#22 2017-02-27 08:12:59

Re: Win - SLC rastering problem

Board footer